Author Topic: IOX012-010 vs IOX012-110  (Read 8234 times)

Offline G30RG3

  • PLUS+1 Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 76
  • Karma: +3/-0
IOX012-010 vs IOX012-110
« on: November 29, 2024, 11:41:21 AM »
Is a recompile with new hardware needed when replacing an (I)/(O)X*-0?? with an (I)/(O)X*-1??

Offline Matt_Eng

  • PLUS+1 Developer
  • ***
  • Posts: 22
  • Karma: +10/-0
Re: IOX012-010 vs IOX012-110
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2024, 07:29:35 PM »
I dont expect that communication protocol has changed, so it should work.
However I've only tried swapping between an -010 and -110 with version of the 2.15 of the compliance block, which had some bug fixes and explicit support for the -010 and -110.

I also see a version 2.17 in the update center, so it may be beneficial to update and recompile or at least review the revision history.

-Matt_Eng

Offline G30RG3

  • PLUS+1 Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 76
  • Karma: +3/-0
Re: IOX012-010 vs IOX012-110
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2024, 01:34:25 PM »
I'm not the programmer, I just need to offer a replacement IOX. I expect the software to be ancient because the other hardware components(screen and ยต-CTRL) are both obsoleted a few years ago. 
The remaining value of the machine is low, so reprogramming and replacing all hardware is too expensive.
« Last Edit: December 17, 2024, 01:36:30 PM by G30RG3 »